| FAQ |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
Menu
| Bible Versions Questions and discussion about the Bible version issue. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
| Bible Versions Questions and discussion about the Bible version issue. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
06-27-2009, 01:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I just posted this reply, on another forum where the same question was asked.
"I have both the Oxford 1769 KJV, and Pure Cambridge KJV Bibles. Also a 1967 Scofield NRB-KJV, that Bible up-dates a lot of words, and does not remove any. But is by anyone in the know, not considered a KJV. So how could an easy reading KJV, which probably does more than the 1967 Scofield in changing words, be considered a trustful KJV." |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
