I stood there in the store thinking "A Zondervan?" I had with me the list of common misprints and this one had one out of 17+. There were two Bibles that did not have commentary, one was an economy edition Thomas Nelson, one was a imitation leather Zondervan. Zondervan and Nelson both have a bad history with printing Bibles, but I suppose the main reason was that it was much more durable, thinking that I could get a better reprint when this one wore out. However, after using it, I fail to see any error that Zondervan put in here. That is, of course, open to correction from faithful Bibleprotector, if I am wrong. Since it is so useful and simple-simple meaning no cross-refrences, which could be misleading since they are not inspired, commentary, doubt-csting notes (or any notes), and the unnecessary like. Unlike other fine KJBs out there, with this one, I do not feel confident that I could literally beat someone to a pulp with it because it doesn't contain so much "stuff".
|