Quote:
|
Connie, you may not take these statements as facts, for indeed they are not. However, they are at least evidence from a logical prospective. The one piece of evidence that is a fact is what is available today. We have a copy that dates no earlier than 250+ years after the completion of the NT. That copy is clearly riddled with error when compared to the Hebrew OT.
|
OK, I'm listening. I'm interested in this subject now, though I won't have much time for it for a while.
But I have to add that having a surviving copy from a particular year really doesn't mean much about when the original was created, OR when the errors entered into it.