View Single Post
  #30  
Old 10-23-2008, 10:09 AM
pbiwolski's Avatar
pbiwolski pbiwolski is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Penna.
Posts: 223
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diligent View Post
David referred to himself at conception (Ps 51:5). If all three parts were not there, then how was David himself?
Yep, you said it, "at conception."

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diligent View Post
I just don't buy your reasoning.
And now for YOUR reasoning...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diligent View Post
We know children have a body, soul, and spirit. What business do we have correcting the Bible when it says an unborn baby is a child or an infant? It calls the unborn human a child in at least 25 verses and an infant in one. I'll stick with that.
Are you serious? This is your reasoning?

So what if the unborn is called a "child." I'll stick with it too! However, it proves nothing to convey a living soul in the womb as you suggest.

And c'mon, please don't accuse me (or others) of correcting the Bible with such a lame statement about "child/infant."
Check out II Kings 4. The "child" is dead and its flesh has gone cold, but its still a "child."