Quote:
Originally Posted by jerry
There is nothing wrong with using a Strong's Concordance to understand our King James Bible - as it contains definitions of every word in it - but the problem comes when someone takes one possible definition and attempts to correct the English of our KJV with it.
Webster's 1828 Dictionary is an excellent resource - but there are some definitions that do not help to understand the usage of the word in the KJV - or it does not show how the meaning fits a particular passage.
|
Agreed on both counts. I find all sorts of material is useful in study -- Strong's and 1828 Webster being high on the list -- but nothing is authoritative next to the KJB.