Thread: 1611 vs 1769
View Single Post
Old 07-02-2009, 10:48 PM
Samuel's Avatar
Samuel Samuel is offline
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Asheville NC
Posts: 130

I think 99.9% of the evidence he posted, is nothing more than bad 1611 spelling, and typo errors. Which went through quite a few editions, before they got all the wrinkles ironed out; but that does not constitute a different Bible, or subsequent re-translations.

However each MV that comes out, is re-translation of a re-translation. None of which agree with the others, just like the manuscripts they come from.