View Single Post
  #7  
Old 09-06-2008, 11:44 PM
bibleprotector's Avatar
bibleprotector bibleprotector is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 587
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven
However the actual Scofield editions are listed as 1909 and 1917 and I would presume that the Bible text in his editions are far more true to the historic text than the special 1911 Oxford.
That "Tercentenary Edition" does not seem to be the one which might otherwise be called by that name, being the 1911 facsimile of the 1833 reprint of the 1611 edition (still reprinted today by Thomas Nelson), as http://openlibrary.org/b/OL7092789M

Whatever the case, such special prepared or the reprint-facsimile editions are not "normal Oxfords". Scofield's 1917 edition presents a text which is close to normal Oxfords (with some similarity to London Editions).