I didn't mis quote him. I quoted what Jesus said. That is all I quoted. There is no need to get so upset.
The KJV says the "poor" in verse 5. Diligent said this can not be the object of reference for verse 7. One of the arguments he presented was that of the poor not being preserved.
Here is the exact quote.
Quote:
|
The meaning of Psalm 12 is perfectly plain. The chapter is a contrast between David's love of God's words and the vanity of men's words. Incorrectly reading verse 7 to refer to a promise to preserve the poor forever ruins the praise of God's promises David is offering. It also leaves us with the strange, untenable position that God is promising the preservation of the poor in perpetuity -- a tenet not to be found elsewhere in Scripture.
|
Yes that tenant is to be found elsewhere in the scriptures.
I did not misrepresent anything.
Sorry I didn't captilize
Hebrew. Certainly you can't consider me a novice because I wrote such. I never have read where a novice was defined by his punctuation skills.