View Single Post
  #147  
Old 02-07-2009, 11:25 AM
Steven Avery Steven Avery is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 462
Default Psalm 12 - 1983 Kutilek article, Lackey, Moorman responses

Hi Folks,

The Doug Kutilek article goes back to 1983 (The Biblical Evangelist, 17:21, October 14, 1983) so he has had over 20 years to find the simple errors we are pointing out on this thread ! (Yes, there are more.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Man
For a review of Kutilek's article, see
This blog.
Hi Man,

That is one of the direct responses to the Doug Kutilek article. Another is given by David Cloud, relating his correspondence to Bruce Lackey (1930-1988) in 1984. David Cloud moves around his URLs, so here it is in archive.org.

http://web.archive.org/web/200802121...ervationis.htm
Fundamentalists Following Textual Critics in Denying/Questioning Biblical Preservation


This next Jack Moorman paper was also largely in response to the Doug Kutilek article denying preservation in Psalm 12.

http://www.feasite.org/foundation/fbcpresv.htm
Psalm 12:6-7 and Bible Preservation
by Jack Moorman - Foundation Magazine - March-April 1994


And Kent Brandenburg works directly with a few of the Kutilek claims, at least in some forums and blogs, perhaps in the book. Two examples.

http://www.sharperiron.com/showthrea...79&page=1&pp=7
Exegesis and Admitting Error - Sharper Iron Forum

http://fundyreformed.wordpress.com/2...debate-part-4/
The Promise Argument - Fred Butler Blog (opponent of Preservation in Psalm 12)


All of these responses to Doug Kutilek make good, solid points. Some could be more assertive for the best "words" interpretation and there are some weaknesses as well in the above.

Hopefully, as the thread moves along, we will be able to coalesce the best of the best, plus more, in a summary of the articles. Even specifically looking at least at :

Doug Kutilek article
Jack Moorman article
Bruce Lackey comments
blog comments above

For the opposition Kutilek at least does not make the tawdry blunder of attacking the King James Bible translation. Kutilek only opposes our interpretation. Some use the deficient translation to make their points (James White and Mark Phillip Purchase of New Zealand).

And while there are other "Psalm 12 preservation of the words of God" opponents to note and comment upon (e.g. James Price, W. Edward Glenny, Lim Seng Hoo) most of the issues can be reached through the articles above.

Shalom,
Steven

Last edited by Steven Avery; 02-07-2009 at 11:32 AM.