Guys,
I thought I'd add this.
Even if you disagree with Ruckman on the The Superiority of the KJV if you will read what he says about the issue you may agree far more than you think. Go read what he says about the issue, not what many others have told you what you thinks he says. I'll bet 99% of you will agree with him on this issue. Below is an example. If I find all of the reasons why the KJV is better than the originals I'll post them all later. There are like 10 or 12 reasons why the KJV is better. I do not recall them all, here are a few.
1. We can read the KJV, we can not read the originals, we do not have them.
2. Chapter and verse markings in KJV, not in the originals.
3. We have the KJV, we do not have the originals, nor did Paul have the originals of the O.T. for example.
4. With the KJV we only need to read one language, with the originals ( if we had them ) we'd have to be able to read three languages.
5. The KJV has them all in one book, if we had the originals they would not be all in one book.
Here is the link for the The Ruckman Reference Bible. It starts on page three.
http://www.kjv1611.org/BBB/2005/jun-05.pdf
Atlas