View Single Post
Old 06-26-2009, 06:04 PM
chette777's Avatar
chette777 chette777 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Puerto Princesa City, Palawan Philippines
Posts: 1,431

I understand it. but you interpreted the Parables as being the church today by placing Nebuchadnezzar inline with it and then saying the tree was a gentile king and then applying all the scriptures to the church today. In placing those scriptures together and then making your statements you tied it to Paul's teaching to the church. you literally replaced The fact that the Kingdom is Israel with the church being prideful in the last days .

So the subtle replacement of Israel with the the church (which is both Jews and Gentiles) may not have been your intent but it is there. RC and Covenant theologists would have loved it because they replace Israel with the church. But we are told to: 2Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. If you were rightly dividing instead of wrongly uniting scriptures you could taught it correctly as Israel and then showed the application to the church today for the churches edification.

I am not saying what you shared was not a truth. it was just how you went about to express the truth by uniting scriptures together to formulate your idea that takes on the form of Replacement Theology.