Quote:
|
Why can't you just admit that YOU DON'T KNOW why "strain at" is in the KJB?
|
Oh but I do know, want to know why it's there? Because God put it there! If He didn't want "at" in there, He wouldn't have kept it there for 397 years!
Quote:
By the way, the Defined King James put out by Waite has a footnote to "strain at" that says simply:
Quote:
i.e., out
|
It may very well have been a word commonly used as "out" then, but I'm not sure. Until I find out whether they were interchangable then, I wouldn't put to much confidence in what any comentary says.