View Single Post
  #123  
Old 05-14-2009, 07:04 PM
ChaplainPaul ChaplainPaul is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 45
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke View Post
Why would it mean that..

You would have to be B.O. to believe that (Byzantine Only) or something else. And that stinks!

The TR is a greek New Testament. IT has nothing to do with the old testament. And so to be TRO, would also mean one rejects the OT. So TRO doesn't exist. Really, TRO is scholarship-only when it comes down to it, even if they prefer the KJB as an english translation (which would negate the ONLY bit of the TRO).

TYVM!
The OT differences are all but ignored. The main argument is the differences in the NT. I don't think people want to look like they're rejecting the OT. Someone who says they are TRO is not making a statement on the OT.

(...and I have got to make a list of these acronyms...I keep getting mixed-up...I first thought P.O.T.W. stood for "President of the World..." TYVM?)