Quote:
Originally Posted by solabiblia
Why is a theory based on deletion any more valid than a theory based on insertion through textual tenacity?
|
WHY? WHY? WHY?....
"Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth." - 2 Tim 3:7
Quote:
Originally Posted by solabiblia
We all agree that the witness of the Biblical texts shows remarkable tenacity. If you were to approach the subject without presuppositions, would you not conclude that the copyists would be more likely to expand the text than to delete passages?
|
No. We would jump right over that "cow patty" and conclude that your posts are STILL doing nothing on this forum other than casting doubt on God's Bible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by solabiblia
What if you were not a KJO? Would you still be able to assert that no insertions took place, only deletions? How would you defend such a position?
|
WHAT IF? WHAT IF? What if you actually had a FINAL AUTHORITY like we do, one that you could hold in your hand and honor, and DEFEND THAT POSITION?
Ahhh, Solabiblia...
I had hoped over that last few weeks that your posts would improve here, but as everyone can see below you have not changed from your original reply to Biblestudent, and I take it you still think we are conducting in MINDLESS DRIVEL, so what difference does it make? Please, gather up your tenacity, deletions, presuppositions and theories and head back to your snake oil wagon, it's still parked where you left it and nobody is buying what you are "producing."
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biblestudent
That's exactly the same thing that come to my mind. I would never join an anti-KJV forum unless I'm trying to persuade them, or give them a hard time, or ready to denounce the KJV. So it really makes me wonder why some people join the AV161 Bible Forum. I believe we would like to learn more about the AV1611 here. Others who have no plan to believe the AV1611 is the infallible Word of God are free to join other forums for that purpose.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by solabiblia
Translation: we don't want any of our comments to be challenged in this forum. We have the sneaking feeling that our arguments have holes in them, and it makes us uncomfortable when someone points them out to us. So, go away and let us pat ourselves on the back for our MINDLESS DRIVEL, or we will attack you as a Bible-hater and cast aspersions on your state of grace.
|