Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianT
Hi Bro. Parrish,
The only difference between what I said and what others have said is that I see no authoritative reason for things to have changed in 1611.
|
Nonsense.
Can you show me another person on this thread who said an inerrant Bible does not exist right now in 2008? Please don't try to project your delusion on others. What you wrote in post no. 9 is still there, and plain to see:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianT
So yes, I 'deny the doctrine of an inerrant Bible composed of 66 books as having ever existed and certainly not now"
|
That is your "authority" and your "doctrine."
It's as plain as a dead blowfish on the beach.
You are teaching others that the KJV contains errors, so I see a VAST difference between you and the others who are honoring God's Word on this forum, please don't make this worse than it has to be.
