Tim,
Quote:
|
Peter Ruckman teaches that life starts when a baby breaths open air out side of the mothers womb.
|
Quote:
|
Does that misquote his position?
|
No because without a soul no human is anything more than a dog or cat. Without a living soul no man is a man. We are not talking about just a body here. We are talking soul. All men have 3 parts, and must have 3 parts to be a man. Anything else is an animal and not in the image of God.
This is Ruckmans stand and he uses Gen. 2:7 taken out of context for this false doctrine. He bases this false doctrine by taking the Bible out of context. AS an example, RC's do the same thing with John 3 and use it for getting babies wet and saying they must do this to be saved. All false doctrines come from taking the Bible out of context and wrongly dividing God's word. We all oppose this and will agree that RC's take John 3 out of context to teach false doctrine.
Dose Ruckman take Gen 2:7 out of context?
yes or no.
Dose Gen 2:7 apply to you?
Did God make you out of dirt?
yes or no
Did God breath into you the breath of life?
yes or no
Who dose Gen. 2:7 apply to?
You seem to be far more worried that I may have misstated what Ruckman has said, yet Ruckman taking Gen. 2:7 100% out of context seems to be just fine with this. Why is this the case? This is what I'd like to know?
Atlas