Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel
In Genesis 30:31 it follows the L, O, OE examples rather than the 1611. Where it does not follow 1611 examples it mostly follows the Cambridge. With exception of the Gen. 30:31 grammatical example, being a [.] instead of [:]. so I must conclude it is KJV 1769.
|
In my now-lost collection, I had a Gideons KJV and I think a Holman Dime Store Special that had changed out "colour, labour", etc., for "color, labor".
The "New" Schofield KJV of 1967 is neither a Schofield or a KJV due to internal textual changes, and notes Schofield did not add, plus "footnotes" impeaching the various contested verses between the KJV and W&H. Dr. Ruckman publishes a small booklet outlining the differences between the NSRB and the KJV.
Grace and peace
Tony