Forum: Bible Versions
05-04-2008, 11:38 AM
|
|
Replies: 63
Views: 59,900
From my observation of the facts and arguments...
From my observation of the facts and arguments given in this thread, the book that today is called the LXX was of late production, possibly the 4th generation AD. The issue of the existence of a...
|
|
Forum: Bible Versions
05-02-2008, 11:57 AM
|
|
Replies: 63
Views: 59,900
|
|
Forum: Bible Versions
05-02-2008, 11:28 AM
|
|
Replies: 63
Views: 59,900
|
|
Forum: Bible Versions
05-02-2008, 11:21 AM
|
|
Replies: 63
Views: 59,900
Steven, thanks for the in-depth response. I am...
Steven, thanks for the in-depth response. I am surprised, based on your quote of Josephus, that the issue of the early dating of the LXX is not more settled. My only assumption is that what we call...
|
|
Forum: Bible Versions
05-01-2008, 07:55 PM
|
|
Replies: 63
Views: 59,900
|
|
Forum: Bible Versions
05-01-2008, 07:37 PM
|
|
Replies: 63
Views: 59,900
|
|
Forum: Bible Versions
05-01-2008, 12:19 PM
|
|
Replies: 63
Views: 59,900
Connie, you may not take these statements as...
Connie, you may not take these statements as facts, for indeed they are not. However, they are at least evidence from a logical prospective. The one piece of evidence that is a fact is what is...
|
|
Forum: Bible Versions
05-01-2008, 11:49 AM
|
|
Replies: 63
Views: 59,900
|
|
Forum: Bible Versions
05-01-2008, 11:23 AM
|
|
Replies: 63
Views: 59,900
|
|
Forum: Bible Versions
05-01-2008, 09:05 AM
|
|
Replies: 63
Views: 59,900
Did the LXX exist before the NT?
I am starting this thread in response to a suggestion by Steven Avery to review some of the teachings of Dr. Peter Ruckman [not as a means of personal attack or support of him] from a Biblical...
|
