Forum: Bible Versions
07-07-2009, 11:38 AM
|
|
Replies: 23
Views: 92,492
|
|
Forum: Bible Versions
07-07-2009, 10:13 AM
|
|
Replies: 23
Views: 92,492
I do not mind being called a corrector if it...
I do not mind being called a corrector if it means pointing out the errors of those who claim that the KJB says something which it does not say. I support the correcting of typographical errors.
I...
|
|
Forum: Bible Versions
07-06-2009, 11:35 AM
|
|
Replies: 23
Views: 92,492
How can the typographical errors of the first...
How can the typographical errors of the first edition of 1611 be right? Anyone who defends the Word of God does not defend typographical errors as though they are the Word of GOD!
Likewise, it is...
|
|
Forum: Bible Versions
07-06-2009, 10:49 AM
|
|
Replies: 23
Views: 92,492
|
|
Forum: Bible Versions
07-06-2009, 10:28 AM
|
|
Replies: 23
Views: 92,492
What mark do you allude to? I will now present...
What mark do you allude to? I will now present the KJB, which is pure, true and right.
Mt*14:9 And the king was sorry: nevertheless for the oath's sake, and them which sat with him at meat, he...
|
|
Forum: Bible Versions
07-06-2009, 08:51 AM
|
|
Replies: 23
Views: 92,492
Let us assess ideas, but let us not submit to...
Let us assess ideas, but let us not submit to “Only by pride cometh contention” (Prov. 13:10a).
The query at hand is, are there any significant differences between the First 1611 Edition and the...
|
|
Forum: Bible Versions
07-03-2009, 08:50 AM
|
|
Replies: 23
Views: 92,492
|
|
Forum: Bible Versions
07-03-2009, 08:29 AM
|
|
Replies: 23
Views: 92,492
|
