Which Bible(s) Do You Think Are Good?
I know most here are anti-other versions but this is mainly to see what KJVO view you hold. I recently learnd about the Pure Cambridge Edition only belief.
|
This quiz is misguided. There is a distinction between a "Bible" and an "edition" of it. (After all there were two editions of the KJB printed in 1611, the "He" edition, and the "She" edition, see Ruth 3:15.)
TEXT TRANSLATION EDITION TEXT. The Traditional Text is superior to the modern text(s); the Textus Receptus is superior to both; the KJB is the final form of the received text. TRANSLATION. The Reformation TR-based translations are superior to modern versions (i.e. translations); the KJB is the best Bible in the world because it is perfect. EDITION. The traditional lineage of KJB editions are the acceptable ones (as compared to modernised and/or newly edited KJV editions), the last and full result of proper traditional edition improvements (fixing up printing errors, standardising spelling, etc.) is a perfect presentation, the Pure Cambridge Edition. (This is not an ongoing or continuing process. "Saviour" is not going to be "improved" to "Savior"; "Easter" is not going to be improved to some other word, etc.) |
An excellent translation of a poor text is okay with you, Just_a_thought??
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sounds like that's the problem you're having; no King, no right and wrong. "Where the word of a king is, there is power." (Ecc. 8:4) |
Quote:
This is rediculous...I never said there is no right or wrong. I simply studied, prayed, and studied some more, this is the conclusion I feel God has brought me to. You don't have to agree with me. To claim I am out to simply do what I feel is right and don't care what God has to say is casting judgment that is not true. God bless! |
Quote:
Sounds like Metzger, Westcott, Hort and the rest of the Humanistic German Rationalists. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You said that you think that we should pick and choose what texts we think best. Therefore, you are deciding what is right and wrong based on feelings, not facts. How is that taking anything out of context? That's simply stating what you said in less ambiguous terms. |
Quote:
You don't share you email on your profile (which is odd to say the least) so if you would let me know how I can email it to you I will send it your way as soon as you do. In the mean time you can browse through: http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible...king_james.htm http://www.samgipp.com/historybook/ http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/kjvdefen.htm Peace and Love, Stephen |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Website © AV1611.Com.
Posts represent only the opinions of users of this forum and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the webmaster.