AV1611 Bible Forum Archive

AV1611 Bible Forum Archive (https://av1611.com/forums/index.php)
-   Bible Studies (https://av1611.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Dinosaurs (https://av1611.com/forums/showthread.php?t=850)

Bro. Parrish 12-28-2008 12:24 PM



I have no problem with dinosaurs.
There is room for different views here, some believe all dinosaurs were destroyed during the flood, (there is much fossil evidence for flood related dino-deaths), others believe eggs or young were carried on the ark and survived the flood, only to later become extinct at the hands of men—who called them "dragons." The Bible uses ancient names like "Behemoth” and “tannin.” (Job 40:15-19) The word dinosaur was not heard until the 1800's. At any rate, here a few items you may enjoy from my archives about dinosaurs...

70 million-year-old fossil yields preserved blood vessels. Tissue fragments from a Tyrannosaurus rex femur are shown at left, when it is flexible and resilient and when stretched (arrow) returns to its original shape. The middle photo shows the bone after it is air dried. The photo at right shows regions of bone showing fibrous character, not normally seen in fossil bone.

Are they really that old?
If they survived the flood, dinosaurs would have come under increasing pressure from hunters and weather changes—many believe Earth's atmosphere after the flood was changed quite a bit. They were killed out of fear and for food, just like many other large animals down through history. Remember, God has a "master plan"—but that includes allowing men to pretty much handle things on Earth as stewards of the natural world. Men have driven many species to extinction, not just the dinosaurs. Amazingly, scientists (Mary Higby Schweitzer of North Carolina State University) have now found T-Rex bones with blood and soft tissue still present—providing strong evidence to suggest they were on the Earth far more recently than some care to admit. Take a look, they certainly don't look 70 millon years old to me:

More recently, it appears another team has retrieved similarly unfossilized dinosaur bone from Alaska's Colville River in the Liscomb Bone Bed. The team reported that some of these bones are petrified and some are unpetrified or unfossilized, see here:

Evidence for Men and Dinosaurs together?
There is a lot of speculation here, but there are references to dragons in the Bible, and people fighting with dragons throughout European writings and artwork, Marco Polo wrote of the Chinese training dragons, and there is evidence suggesting that dragons or dinosaurs may have been seen by Anasazi Indians in North America at the first link below, related info at bottom:

The so-called Taylor Trail of the Paluxy River in Glen Rose Texas, has been hotly debated over the years. Some creationists have insisted that during the 1960's and 70's it once showed a detailed series of 14 sequential, fossilized human-like footprints on the same sediment platform with at least 134 dinosaur tracks. Of course evolutionists have their own interpretation on this, and much of this evidence has been reported as either naturally eroded indistinct metatarsal dinosaur tracks (see Paleo link below) or simply fakes. Some creationists, such as Ken Ham, have also suggested the tracks are not human, and yet others (Dr. Don Patton) insist the original stratum was destroyed by erosion and disturbed evolutionists with a crow bar, but you can still see what are claimed to be the remarkable series of un-retouched original photos from the 1970's here. Patton claims these images were taken before the two men who attended his presentation destroyed them with an iron bar, the high resolution photos appear to show all five toes, instep and clearly defined heel, take a look and decide for yourself:

The American Sioux Indians have long described the so-called "Thunder Bird" in their culture and history, and always draw it as strangely similar to the pterosaur Pteranodon. There is also a very good bas-relief picture of what appears to be a stegosaurus in the ruins of Angkor outside of Siem Reap, Cambodia:

Komodo's "dragons" were not documented by Europeans until 1910

I think believers should keep an open mind about dinosaurs, as I say, I have no problem with them, and as time goes on we may learn more about them and exactly when they existed. I think it is dangerous to be dogmatic on some things, after all---It was once held that mammoths and mastodons became extinct 30,000 to 40,000 years ago. However, when flint spear points were found in mammoth bones, the evolutionist scientific community had to concede reluctantly that these animals were actually being hunted in America by humans:

Winman 12-30-2008 03:22 AM

I believe that most dinosaurs were killed in Noah's flood which explains dinosaur burial grounds where the bones of sometimes hundreds of dinosaurs are found piled together. I believe that Noah must have carried some dinosaurs onto the ark and that they survived many years after that. This explains the stories of "dragons" in many civilizations over the centuries. There is real evidence that dinosaurs might even be alive today.

Here is an article from National Geographic telling of an intact "mummified" dino that was found just a few years ago.


They cannot explain the remarkable state of preservation of this dino, they can even tell what foods this dino had eaten before it's death!

Instead of seeing this as evidence that dinos lived until very recently, evolutionists have said there must be a previously unknown process of preservation that must be researched. :rolleyes:

There are even reports of recovering DNA which is extremely fragile. It would be remarkable for DNA to survive even a few hundred years, much less 70 million years or so when dinos were supposed to have gone extinct.

Here is an article on the mysterious Ica Stones of Peru that show man and dinos living together.


Bro. Parrish 12-30-2008 09:21 AM

Thanks for your post and comments on the Dinosaurs...
here are more links on the Ica stones of Dr. Javier Cabrera:

Winman 12-30-2008 01:42 PM

Thank you.

The interesting thing about the Omniology site is that the author was an atheist, but through his sincere studies came to believe that the Bible account of creation is true and became a Christian. His testimony can be found on the site.

You mentioned the mammoths in your first post, here are some photos of mammoths that prove they are still alive today!


Bro. Parrish 12-30-2008 02:01 PM

Hmmm, I'm not an expert on pachyderms, how does that differ from an ordinary Asian elephant brother?

Winman 12-30-2008 02:55 PM

Well, I am no expert on elephants either. :)

But these elephants caused quite a controversy, being much larger than any Asian elephants ever found, and because of the exaggerated bump or dome on their heads. Some believe these are true relatives of the mammoth, some claim they are birth defects or mutations.

It is hard to find info, but here is one article I found.


What is truly amazing about the article is that they main reason they give for not accepting this as a "STEGODONT" elephant (even though it has features known only to this elephant) is simply because it does not fit their evolutionary assumptions that it went extinct over a million years ago!

Bro. Parrish 12-30-2008 03:01 PM

Thanks that is interesting... also I didn't realize there has been so much confusion on elephant and mammoth classification, here's more on that from AIG:

Winman 12-30-2008 03:19 PM

I know I am repeating myself, but look at this line from that article:

"the problem is that the Stegodont , the ancestor of both the African and Asian elephants we know today, as well as the extinct mammoth, apparently died out more than a million years ago"

This is the problem with evolutionists, whenever they find evidence that might discredit their pre-conceived assumptions, they simply ignore it or try to explain it away.

Now, I'm not saying these are living Stegodants, but if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck....

Bro. Parrish 12-30-2008 03:57 PM

Yes, you are correct brother, if it doesn't fit the evolutionary mold including millions of years, modern man flips out and short circuits himself, despite the evidence. Please see my extensive comments on this here:

Oh and by the way, here's another "duck" they thought had died out millions of years ago, this one is still swimming:


Winman 12-30-2008 05:31 PM

Yes, the Coelacanth was a huge embarrassment for evolution (one of many).

I used to debate with evolutionists, but it is useless and will just wear you out. They have their minds set and no evidence can change their minds.

I liked your thread, we have done a lot of similar reading. :)

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

Website © AV1611.Com.
Posts represent only the opinions of users of this forum and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the webmaster.

Software for Believing Bible Study