Pink Agenda Watch...
 

The latest on Prop 8 from Malkin:
The homosexual activists are SKIPPING WORK,
if one of your employees fails to show up tomorrow,
I guess you'll have to wonder... :cool:

Anti-Prop. 8 activists will “call in gay”
By Michelle Malkin

"Terrific. First, the tolerance bullies work to get other people fired from their jobs for donating to the Prop. 8 traditional marriage ballot measure.
Then, the anti-Prop. 8 mobsters all decide to take off work themselves and “call in gay” to prove how indispensable they are to the economy.
“DAY WITHOUT A GAY” commences tomorrow.
If this goes anything like those “Days Without an Illegal Alien” events went, we’ll survive." more here:
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/12/09...l-call-in-gay/

Suppose this was your business, your job?
Mormons are being hunted down by the prop 8 radicals,
you can bet the Baptists are next...

Another Mormon run over by the
anti-Prop. 8 mob’s bus
By Michelle Malkin

"You remember Marjorie Christoffersen.
My friend Diana West first alerted me to her plight in the aftermath of Prop. 8’s passage. Christoffersen is the Mormon restaurant manager of the El Coyote restaurant in Los Angeles who committed the sin of donating $100 to the traditional ballot measure. Her individual donation spurred an angry mob of gay activists to picket the cafe, threaten employees and patrons, and bully the business into contributing a payment to make the mob stop.
Now, in the wake of resignations by LA Film Festival director Richard Raddon and California Musical Theater director Scott Eckern, Christoffersen has joined these other Mormon voters in quitting her job over her support of Prop. 8. Gay groups are doing a happy dance."
more info/links here:
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/12/08...op-8-mobs-bus/

CIZEK HAS OFFICIALLY TURNED...

Evangelical leader supports 'gay' civil unions
Claims Christians should 'give biblical point of view a different slant...
http://www.worldnetdaily.com:80/inde...w&pageId=82709

CIZIK appears to be a CINO on a slippery slope, looks like Dobson was right back in 2007...

"In March 2007, Focus on the Family founder James Dobson of Colorado Springs and several other traditional right-wing Christian leaders publicly demanded that the NAE fire Cizik over what they termed a "preoccupation" with global warming. They wanted the NAE to stay focused on what they described as just "the great moral issues of our time": opposing abortion, gay rights and sex outside of marriage. Dobson and his allies added that global warming is an unproven theory.

NAE board members did no such thing. In fact, they gave Cizik the biggest show of support possible by simply making no response at all to the resignation demand, as though it had never existed. Instead, the board simply unanimously reaffirmed its 2004 vote of the "For the Health of the Nation" declaration. (See "All these issues matter," above.)

Not giving up, the 72-year-old Dobson, along with supporters ranging from Christian singer Pat Boone to U.S. Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla, in May unveiled a second campaign to combat Cizik, called "We Get It!" Their message: Christians should support "biblical" solutions to global warming. They warn against a prevailing culture of "knee-jerk" reactions to our changing climate." more here:
http://www.csindy.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A29875

California Attorney General attacks own constitution
Tells court to throw out voter-adopted marriage definition

California Attorney General Jerry Brown, who is responsibile for defending the state's laws and constitution from challenges, is urging the state Supreme Court to toss a voter-approved definition of marriage that now is part of the state constitution.

In a new statement on the dispute over Proposition 8, through which voters in November approved limiting marriage to one man and one woman, Brown said the vote must be "invalidated."

The Supreme Court rejected a stay on Proposition 8, allowing it to remain in effect and preventing more homosexuals from exchanging vows until the case is decided. Approximately 18,000 homosexual "marriages" have taken place since June when the court ruled 4 to 3 to legalize the unions. "The court is playing with fire by threatening to destroy the people's vote on marriage," he said in a statement. "The California Constitution clearly says that the voters have the right to alter the highest law of the land. It's the beauty of the American system of government. The four Supreme Court justices who unconstitutionally invented homosexual 'marriages' – Ron George, Joyce Kennard, Kathryn Werdegar and Carlos Moreno – seem to be ignoring the fact that the people get the last word, not the judges."
more:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.p...w&pageId=84310

Well the official White House website changed yesterday at noon, (my daughter told me the entire class was watching the website at school when it changed) here's a look at the updated info with regard to the "pink agenda," scroll down to.....

Support for the LGBT Community

Support Full Civil Unions and Federal Rights for LGBT Couples:
"President Obama supports full civil unions that give same-sex couples legal rights and privileges equal to those of married couples. Obama also believes we need to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and enact legislation that would ensure that the 1,100+ federal legal rights and benefits currently provided on the basis of marital status are extended to same-sex couples in civil unions and other legally-recognized unions..."

Oppose a Constitutional Ban on Same-Sex Marriage:
"President Obama voted against the Federal Marriage Amendment in 2006 which would have defined marriage as between a man and a woman and prevented judicial extension of marriage-like rights to same-sex or other unmarried couples." These are quotes from:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/agenda/civil_rights/

Get ready for new battle over 'gays' in military
Liberals are preparing to submit legislation to the panel that would reverse the 15-year-old "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy...
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.p...w&pageId=87867

Sissy's are good in a group against old ladies carrying signs to repent. but put them on the front line with Al Queda's best they will run like a pack dogs.

Remember the female "couple" who filed lawsuits and gave us the first state in the U.S. to recognize same-sex "marriage"? Guess what happened?

They split up after 2 years and they just filed for divorce.

Kris Mineau, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, a public policy group that fought to repeal the legalization of "gay" unions, said their separation is confusing.

"Divorce is a very painful issue, but I also can't help but reflect on the pain this couple has caused on the commonwealth and the nation to redefine marriage. And now they're getting divorced? It doesn't make a lot of sense," Mineau said. "Obviously, they don't hold the institution in very high esteem."
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.p...w&pageId=87950

So all they did was cause more time and work for the Govt.

LOL, yep, pretty much.

Peace and Love,
Stephen

Unfortunately, they also helped to embolden the activists and opened the flood gates for more lawsuits demanding state approvals for homosexual couples. We have seen the results already as the battle continues in California... (see posts 1, 2 and 4 in this thread, re: Proposition 8).

Regarding the sin of homosexuality: This sin is labeled as an "Abomination" in various places in the Bible, such as Lev. a8:22 and 1Kings 14:28. It is my understanding that an abomination is a sin which provokes God's anger and is in a different category from sins which do not automatically provoke God's anger. This understanding is different from many Christians, such as Billy Graham, who say that since all sin separates people from God there is no difference between an abomination and stealing a candy bar. It also seems to me that anything that is an "abomintaion" to God will be extremely repulsive to a believer, not an understandable sin such as when a person in need steals just barely what is needed.

I don't know Bill, but it's an interesting point.
I think homosexuality is nothing new, it's been around a long time and there are sins which are worse in my opinion. From what I have seen over the years, homosexuals are very unhappy (un-gay) and confused people. I think as brother Chambers from Exodus International has proven, they just need to see the love of Christ, and they can repent just like anyone else. The good news is—God's love can overpower and bring freedom from this sin and other sins which are even worse. Sin is simply no match for the power of God!

The purpose of this thread is a little different, it's not to bash sinners, but to expose and educate regarding the AGENDA which is largely being driven by activists, politicians and the media. Some of these activists are homosexual and some are not, but the AGENDA is going to touch all of us in one way or another and faster than we think. This was also the purpose of my Obama thread as well, I had hours of research on there but unfortunately that was deleted with no warning and my efforts are gone. The American people need to be aware of the coordinated effort to radically change our nation by an active and imbedded group of liberal socialists, marxists and anti-God activists, including redefining the family and even re-writing the U.S. Constitution. As my previous posts here show, we have already seen the California Attorney General attacking his own state constitution (see post 4). Religious organizations and churches are quickly being re-branded as "hate groups" (see post 2). We have already seen how the new Administration believes we need to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act (post 5). These are highly destructive morality plans being carefully crafted and promoted by a group of government employees (public servants) being paid by our tax dollars. That is what this thread is about.

I'll refrain from commenting on Billy, but I will say he's wrong. First of all, it is true that sin seperates us from God:

But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid his face from you, that he will not hear. (Isaiah 59:2 KJV)

But some Christians falsely claim that one sin is the same as the other, but they say this because they don't read the Bible and believe what is said therein.

For example, consider the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and try and tell me that one sin is the same as another:

Jesus answered, Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except it were given thee from above: therefore he that delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin. (John 19:11 KJV)

The difficulty in dealing with queers is that they're reprobates.

And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; (Romans 1:28 KJV)

Now Noah Webster defines reprobate as:
Which to anyone who has witnessed to a faggot knows, these folks will deny God till they're blue in the face. Personally, I think that the average homo thinks that he can get away with their filthiness by burying their head in the sand to the truth of God's Words; as if not knowing what God has said will keep them from being accountable. This is also the reason why they get so violent when they are forced to hear the Word of God. You mark my words, these sodomites will get VERY nasty when they're confronted by God's Word. I've tried every tactic in dealing with them. I've tried to be super humble and meek as I present the truth to them, and I've tried the Edwards approach by preaching them as sinners in the hands of an angry God. Jude 1:23-24 just doesn't apply to these folks:

And of some have compassion, making a difference: And others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh. (Jude 1:22-23 KJV)

I truly haven't a clue how to witness to a sodomite. I guess that's why in Israel they:

And he took away the sodomites out of the land, and removed all the idols that his fathers had made. (1 Kings 15:12 KJV)

To me it seems like the only way to reach a sodomite is through prayer. God is the one that must work in their hearts. But I'll tell you one thing I'm conviced about, that is that straight talk is and should be the way we deal with these folks. I've read lots of internet testimonies of ex-homos that got saved because one brave soul told him/her the truth about their standing with God. I, personally, will not allow myself to be accused before God as one who didn't tell people the truth. I know what awaits these folks at the great white throne judgement. I would spare them. Truly, I would. *sigh*

Peace and Love,
Stephen

Oh come on now, your efforts aren't gone. Here, I'll post the links to all the information you shared and then some:

http://www.wnd.com
http://michellemalkin.com
http://www.onenewsnow.com
http://www.av1611.org/index.html
(use discernment on the next two, they're both Lordship Salvation / Calvinist ministries)
http://www.sliceoflaodicea.com
http://www.alittleleaven.com

There, now anyone who wants to feel depressed about the state of affairs in the United States, as well as the Church, can have at it.

For Jesus' sake,
Stephen

Hmm, well other than the top two I have never even been on ANY of those sites. I won't go as far as calling you a jackanapes, (I like you too much) but clearly you don't know what you're talking about. However if you want to take your efforts to the top two and gather up all my posts I won't hold it against you, and it would be helpful, as I can add them to my archives easier. Let me know when you have them ready.

If it depresses you don't read it brother, but it's not about depression. It's about current events and how they will impact all of us, even pastors and churches. The average American has no idea what the liberal agenda means for them, and I'm sad to say many wonderful Christians are just as dumb. Many young people don't know the difference between the UAW and the ACLU, and they don't know how they were started either. Why? Because the colleges are full of socialist professors. Look brother, you and I have a history. I respect your views, but we have had our arguments, and I'm tired of it. I know what you are trying to do here. Please back off my posts, don't be a troll and if you don't like my threads just don't click and we can all remain friends defending the KJV right up to and beyond the point when the "P.C." police ban it as hate speech. I trust you can take the mature path with your next reply. If not, kindly PM me and we can discuss it there. :)

*sigh* Ok, I'm not going to take offense to anything you've written, but I would like to say that you still haven't figured me out. I'm not trying to prevent people from hearing the things you're posting. Every single one of those links I posted I check every single day. The news is very important to me. I'm not trying to bury my head in the sand, and I'm certainly not trying to encourage others to do so. I just think that this forum is for a certain type of content, which can be easily deduced by looking at the url. This thread is similar to your Obama thread, but the reason I haven't considered it inappropriate is because I think it has a redeeming quality in that we should know how to witness to sodomites, and know what to expect from them. But the whole using these forums to link to countless news articles that don't deal with the Holy Bible just doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. I understand your passion completely. You have to realize that I'm very much so burdened by the state of the union as well as the state of the Christian Church. But I think we need to keep them seperate, as in we should be able to freely discuss the Bible and topics pertenant to it on one forum, and on another forum discuss politics from a Christian perspective. Perhaps this doesn't make sense to you. Perhaps I am in error, I admit that I could very well be. So don't, PLEASE, don't take my write-ups as me trying to fan the flames between you and I. Personally, I hold no ill feelings towards you. I've enjoyed the discussions we've had when they've related to the Word of God. I hope we can continue to have even more such discussions. Also, I know I'm a bit abrasive at times, which is one of my numerous character defects. So please forgive me for this.

For Jesus' sake,
Stephen

Stephen, the articles are posted to educate and encourage discussion. I realize that bothers you but your concern is unfounded and kinda silly. I'm not sure why you seem to have problems with my threads but I think it's because you seem to think this entire forum is "reserved" for topics you like! This forum is in no way "LIMITED" to the discussion of Greek and Hebrew texts, or the evils of the NIV, or the latest exegesis on Revelation! If we were not "allowed" to link articles on other issues, then I'm sure the admin would tell me. If people don't want to read them, no one is forcing them to.

Before you type anything else, look up at the top of this thread and read the admin's description of this forum:

"Current events,
including politics and culture."

Again, if you don't like my threads just don't click and we can all remain friends defending the KJV, right up to and beyond the point when the "P.C." police ban it as hate speech.

Now please, if you have a problem in the future with my posts or my threads, kindly take it to PM mode and we can discuss it there, thanks my brother and God bless. :)

You're right brother. I am in error on this. I'd always noticed a Current Events section but never noticed that it was for politics and culture. I apologize for speaking out of place on this. You will not get any more objections from me on your posts of this nature.

Just so you know, I felt a great conviction for my immature post tonight (post number 15). Truth be told I felt good and bad about Brandon removing the Obama thread. I felt good because some of the comments which others made (I'm not referring to your article posts/links here) were of a spirit which I don't agree with, and believe is contrary to what we're taught in the Scriptures. I felt bad because I understand what you're trying to do with your posts, and I'm not in disagreement on what I believe is your heart on this matter. So that being said, know that after spending time in prayer just now and in the Scriptures I feel I do owe you an apology. I hope you will forgive me, and understand that I still have a youthful tenacity to speak before I think. I am truly sorry.

Peace and Love,
Stephen

Very much appreciated, and thanks for your mature words.
I know you have a heart for God, let's work together, win others to Christ and keep God's people informed, educated on the issues that impact our lives and nation...
may the Lord bless you my brother! :)

Here's something we all should watch.

http://www.silencingchristians.com

Peace and Love,
Stephen

That's a very good presentation, thanks for the link...

Trying to get my thoughts together on how to talk to people involved in abomination sins. I think it is good to distinguish between people who are just caught up in a sin but don't assertively justify the sin and those who justify the sin and put down anyone who opposes their activity (call evil good and good evil). I think the "struggling sinner" should be treated with understanding and compassion, like Jesus dealt with the adulterous woman at the well (John 4:1-30). The self-righteous sinner who despises anyone who does right should be treated forcefully like Jesus did with the Pharisees (Matt. 23:1-39).
As considering the sin itself, it seems to me that sins of perverted sex: Homosexuality (Lev.:18:22 and Rom. 1:17-32), Adultery (Lev. 18:20,26,27), and Beastiality (Lev. 18:23,26,27) should cause an an automatically repulsive reaction by anyone who has the "mind of Christ," even when the sinning person is to be treated gently.
A sin of perverting a young child caused in Jesus (Matt.:18:6, Mark 9:42, Luke 17:2) a deep, irrevocable, deadly hatred against the offender even though action against the offender was to be delayed.

Yes, and as time goes on we will see evil activists attempting to make more and more of these "socially acceptable" this is already happening in other countries and we saw it here in the U.S. when the ACLU fought to legalize child pornography (New York Vs Ferber, 458 U.S. 747) and protected the monsters at NAMBLA. More on that here:
http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/...-distribution/

That is an interesting video.

Here in Connecticut where I live, the State Supreme Court recently legalized same-sex marriage. There was protest from the public, but not much people could do. On election day we had the chance to vote for a Constitutional Convention where the voters of Connecticut could have outlawed same-sex marriage. The media came out with many commercials against this convention, I saw only one promoting it. The night I voted there were people standing outside the poll who loudly shouted "vote against the convention".
I spoke to quite a few people, most people had no clue what the convention was even about. It got voted down about 65% to 35%, almost exactly the same ratio as the Obama to McCain vote. I am a southerner by birth, from the Bible Belt, it is not easy being a Christian in New England.

Homosexuals seek to change the voting results of the people via activist judges...

PROPOSITION 8 UPDATE:
California Supreme Court Hearing Today

DOWNTOWN SAN DIEGO — As the clock ticked toward today's much-anticipated arguments for and against Proposition 8 before the state Supreme Court, opponents of the initiative rallied for same-sex-marriage rights in downtown San Diego... There was no sign of counter-protesters, but some passers-by murmured their opinions, including one who said, “Didn't we vote on this already?”

Proposition 8, which amends the state constitution to limit marriage to one man and one woman, passed with 52 percent of the vote in November. It was quickly challenged in court.

In San Francisco this morning, Supreme Court justices will hear arguments about the validity of the measure and the same-sex weddings conducted before its approval. The justices will have 90 days to issue rulings.
more here:
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stori...-rally-agains/

Hmmm, I wonder what this will do for AIDS statistics around the world...
I sometimes think Sodom & Gomorrah may have burned off partly because of a virus or bacteria. (Gen. 19:25)

U.S. to sign U.N. gay rights declaration
Former President Bush had refused to endorse the measure in December

ASSOCIATED PRESS March 2009 • MSNBC
The Obama administration will endorse a U.N. declaration calling for the worldwide decriminalization of homosexuality that then-President George W. Bush had refused to sign...
According to negotiators, the Bush team had concerns that those parts could commit the federal government on matters that fall under state jurisdiction. In some states, landlords and private employers are allowed to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation; on the federal level, gays are not allowed to serve openly in the military. It was not immediately clear on Tuesday how the Obama administration had come to a different conclusion... MORE HERE:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29745175/

"...we cannot deny that HIV is a gay disease. We have to own that and face up to that." -- Matt Foreman, former executive director of the National Gay & Lesbian Task Force

The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that homosexuality and bisexuality cause 85% of HIV infections in America (“high-risk heterosexual activity” is defined as non-homosexuals -- mostly women -- who had sexual intercourse with a “bisexual.”)
MORE ON AIDS HERE:
http://savecalifornia.com/index.php/...l-disease.html

Vermont becomes third state to
legalize same-sex marriage...
The Republican governor of Vermont vetoed a bill legalizing same-sex marriage passed by the state's Legislature yesterday, only to have the lawmakers at the Capitol override the veto today...
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.p...w&pageId=94186

More decisions...
May God have mercy on us... the big timber is falling folks...
I am so fearing the judgment of God on our nation...

Iowa same-sex marriage ruling spurs activists
llinois state Rep. Greg Harris agreed that the Iowa decision shows the "the values of basic fairness are spreading from state to state." Harris, a Chicago Democrat who is openly gay, has sponsored a bill that would legalize civil unions in Illinois, giving gay couples many of the legal benefits of marriage. The bill passed out of committee in March and now faces a vote on the House floor. Illinois is one of 14 states that restricts marriage to one man and one woman.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...Z9_9wD97C07QG0

D.C. eyes gay marriage recognition
The D.C. Council will consider Tuesday whether to recognize domestic partnerships granted in other states and countries...
http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009...n-recognition/

I'm saddened by the recent news the college I graduated from is now offering gay/lesbian dorms. I wonder what's next? atheist dorms? how about an israeli or palestinan one so they could have a prank jihad war going on? It appears that 'texas' does not sound so conservative and 'Christian' has been bought and twisted further into a lie already.....:(
this news brings back segregation. disappointing.

here's the link:
http://www.star-telegram.com/metro_n...y/1302883.html

"It’s a chance for students to be part of a unique experience," said David Cooper, TCU associate director for residential life...

Oh brother, did you read what he said? This is the school promoting perversion. Like parents really need the college to give their kids a chance at a homosexual experience!
Pathetic. :cool:

The latest form of Pink Agenda harassment:
Vote against homo-marriage and they mark you on the map!

How Militant Homosexuals are intimidating Prop 8 voters
using Google Maps and Technology

For the backers of traditional marriage and Proposition 8, the state ballot measure to stop single-sex couples from marrying in California, victory has been soured by the ugly specter of intimidation. Some donors to groups supporting the measure have received death threats and envelopes containing a powdery white substance, and their businesses have been boycotted.

The targets of this harassment blame a controversial and provocative Web site, eightmaps.com...

http://www.eightmaps.com/

A college professor from the University of California, San Francisco, wrote a $100 check in support of Proposition 8 in August, because he said he supported civil unions for gay couples but did not want to change the traditional definition of marriage. He has received many confrontational e-mail messages, some anonymous, since eightmaps listed his donation and employer. One signed message blasted him for supporting the measure and was copied to a dozen of his colleagues and supervisors at the university, he said.... Joseph Clare, a San Francisco accountant who donated $500 to supporters of Proposition 8, said he had received several e-mail messages accusing him of “donating to hate”...
Full story here in New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/08/bu...ream.html?_r=3

I just saw this commercial on TV for the first time and almost lost my dinner...
I guess this matchmaking site has no plans to be catering to the religious right...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChPQtMgFZn8

Obama Declares June as Homosexual Month
It's LGBT month, declares Obama
President ties June tribute to 40th anniversary of riot
Barack Obama commemorated the Stonewall riots as an event in which lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgendereds "resisted police harassment that had become all too common," triggering the homosexual rights movement in America. Thus, Obama proclaimed June "Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Pride Month"...

He applauded himself for bring the first president "to appoint openly LGBT candidates to Senate-confirmed positions in the first 100 days of an administration."

"My administration has partnered with the LGBT community to advance a wide range of initiatives," he reminded.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=99901